From The Spectator (UK):
In her game-changing convention speech, Sarah Palin took a swipe at Obama for having been nothing more in his life than a ‘community organiser’.
This prompted the Obama campaign to issue a pained defence of community organisation as a way of promoting social change ‘from the bottom up’. The impression is that community organising is a worthy if woolly and ultimately ineffectual grassroots activity. This is to miss something of the greatest importance: that in the world of Barack Obama, community organisers are a key strategy in a different game altogether; and the name of that game is revolutionary Marxism.
The seditious role of the community organiser was developed by an extreme left intellectual called Saul Alinsky. He was a radical Chicago activist who, by the time he died in 1972, had had a profound influence on the highest levels of the Democratic party. Alinsky was a ‘transformational Marxist’ in the mould of Antonio Gramsci, who promoted the strategy of a ‘long march through the institutions’ by capturing the culture and turning it inside out as the most effective means of overturning western society. In similar vein, Alinsky condemned the New Left for alienating the general public by its demonstrations and outlandish appearance. The revolution had to be carried out through stealth and deception. Its proponents had to cultivate an image of centrism and pragmatism. A master of infiltration, Alinsky wooed Chicago mobsters and Wall Street financiers alike. And successive Democratic politicians fell under his spell.
His creed was set out in his book ‘Rules for Radicals’ – a book he dedicated to Lucifer, whom he called the ‘first radical’. It was Alinsky for whom ‘change’ was his mantra. And by ‘change’, he meant a Marxist revolution achieved by slow, incremental, Machiavellian means which turned society inside out. This had to be done through systematic deception, winning the trust of the naively idealistic middle class by using the language of morality to conceal an agenda designed to destroy it. And the way to do this, he said, was through ‘people’s organisations’.
Far from being – as he has been painted – a ‘post-racial’ politician, Obama’s politics are all about promoting the cause of black people and achieving ‘reparations’ from white society (a perspective through which his whole welfare redistribution agenda is framed). Accordingly, he saw his three-year role as a community organiser in Chicago as mobilising black people for action against their white oppressors. Finding himself hampered in creating an activist network among black churches, he decided to join such a church to give himself more credibility. That’s why he joined the infamous black-power Trinity Church of Christ – a move, it seems, that had less to do with any spiritual quest than as a radical tactic for mobilising the black proletariat.
Obama’s questionable links to various radicals are now well-known: the black power racists Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Fr. Michael Pfleger, the former Weather Underground terrorism supporters Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn.
Obama is simply the latest manifestation of the culture war that the Left started in the late 1960s. He contains within him the bitterness and innate hatred endemic of cultural Marxism. His message of only He being able to bring the Children to the Promised Land reeks of the same lies and distortions coming out of Socialist Europe in the 1930s.
America was built by Rugged Individualism working in the fertile field of Personal Liberty, both of which are poison to the Nanny State Obama wants to create. The damage Obama could do to the US cannot be underestimated.
You’ve got 53 days.
Obama, community organiser, Marxism, Alinsky, activist, Democrat



























3 responses so far ↓
1 Linz // Sep 12, 2008 at 10:55 am
I have never owned any slaves.
My dad never owned any slaves.
His dad never owned any slaves.
Even his dad never owned any slaves.
I do not own blacks anything. Certainly not “reparations” in the form of wealth redistribution.
2 Shamalama // Sep 12, 2008 at 11:23 am
Linz, you are clearly either confused or a liar.
All whites owned black slaves. All whites live in luxury obtained from the sweat and blood of blacks. All whites have denied employment to more qualified blacks. All whites force blacks into crime. All whites force poor black girls into unwanted pregnancy. 93.27% of the money in white wallets was generated solely due to the labors of blacks. All white women would rather have black husbands but are forced into abusive relationships with white men because of pressure from the Klan.
3 Linz // Sep 12, 2008 at 5:45 pm
Oh, Shamalama, stop! You’re making my sides hurt and tears are running down my face. Hahahahaha….