From This Is London:
Women are being given controversial “virginity repair” operations on the NHS, it emerged last night.
Taxpayers funded 24 hymen replacement operations between 2005 and 2006, official figures revealed.
And increasing numbers of women are paying up to £4,000 in private clinics for the procedure apparently under pressure from future spouses or in-laws who believe they should be virgins on their wedding night.
Doctors said most patients are immigrants or British of ethnic origin.
Not just are women being forced, by their culture, to get this terrible procedure, but the British government - using taxpayer dollars pounds - is willing to fund it. I find it difficult to imagine that the majority of British taxpayers agreed to having their money used in this way.
The trend has been condemned by critics as a sign of social regression driven by Islamic fundamentalists. Some countries have made hymen reconstruction operations illegal.
Dr Magdy Hend, consultant gynaecologist at the Regency Clinic, Harley Street, London, who started hymen reconstruction more than 18 years ago in the Middle East and the Gulf, said: “In some cultures they like to see that the women will bleed on the wedding night. If the wife or bride is not a virgin, it is a big shame on the family.”
Dr Hend said he was surprised by the “very good response” to the service and said there is “big competition on the market”.
Most of his clients, he told More4 News, are in their teens or early 20s.
Islam, that wonderful Religion Of Peace™, is the entity forcing girls in their teens or early 20s to have their hymens rebuilt so that they can properly bleed on their wedding night. Did I get that correct, imams in the UK?
And not only that, but the vulture-doctors in Britain are saying there is a “very good response” and there is “big competition on the market.” Oh, I’m sure their Moms are proud of them right about now. These are the very type of vulture-doctors the US needs once HillaryCare goes into action.
The operation can involve suturing of a tear in the hymen, such as might be caused by sexual assault, to help healing.
But it can also be conducted as a purely cosmetic procedure. A membrane is constructed, sometimes including a capsule of an artificial blood-like substance.
This operation is intended to be performed within a few days before an intended marriage.
And there ya go. Ain’t nothing like having a good bleeder in my bed on my wedding night. Boy, that really makes me feel like a Man. Wow.
Are Islamic men really that DICK-LESS?
Labour MP Ann Cryer said she was “absolutely horrified” to learn of the phenomenon.
She added: “We should be trying to protect girls from this.
“It is a form of abuse of women and it may be that the woman who is asking for the operation to be done does not recognise the abuse that is taking place against her, but in later life she certainly will.
FINALLY a voice of reason. Thank you, Labour MP Ann Cryer.
This is a dreadful waste of NHS funds and what barbaric cultures they are to “like to see women bleed”. This is abuse of women, pure and simple and this operation should be banned, without delay, from being performed in this country. This is disgusting - and even more so that the British government is subsidizing it. And this is coming from a Socialized healthcare society that is delaying needed surgeries because they’re either out of available time, no doctors are available, or it costs too much money. Is female circumcision next?
Well I’m pleased to know that my dad was left on the critical list for bypass surgery due to a liver defect for almost 9 months but the NHS pays for this. Disgusting.
- Louanne, London
So people can’t get their life saving drugs because it’s too expensive, but if you want your virginity back then just pop to your nearest hospital? Bleedin’ marvellous.
- S-M Hearmon, London
What an outrageous waste of taxpayers’ money when genuinely ill people urgently need lifesaving drugs the NHS is unable or unwilling to pay for.
- Clare, London
Amen.
virginity repair, NHS, British, Islam, Religion Of Peace
3 responses so far ↓
1 Macker // Dec 18, 2007 at 11:24 am
Um…shouldn’t that be Taxpayer POUNDS?
2 Shamalama // Dec 19, 2007 at 9:19 am
OOPS!
Corrected, sir.
3 edfrogz // Dec 21, 2007 at 1:06 pm
isn’t it amazing that we still cater to this old style of thinking….once again let us wipe off these in the dark countries, repopulate them with the now and we would be better off.