I especially like the tin foil hat treatment. You should also call them slugs and say that thier mother eats dirt! Ha! That’ll take the wind out of thier sails.

Of course, if we are actually trying to debate this claim, and not just insult the writer with petty name calling, then we must actually consider what he is saying and logically form an argument against it.

And that’s where this falls apart. Pop mechanics and all, once you examine the evidence…hmmm…perhaps the reason we are resorting to name-calling is because we know that what they are saying is true?

No….can’t be….could it? When I look at all the evidence and confront it, the official story seems like a poorly spun excuse, not much better than the dog-ate-my-homework story.

In fact, there seems to be far more evidence supporting U.S. complicity than there is supporting the official story; much of which is presented in Mr. Griffin’s book. Of course, you would actually have to read the book to understand this, which means turning pages, moving your eyes left to right, occasionally blinking, etc, all of which is a rather difficult task for the average American these days. Yes, it’s far better to simply dismiss Mr. Griffin’s work as a 200-page ramble than to actually try to understand its argument.

BTW, the Pop Mechanics article is a total straw man.