Hat tip to the Jawa Report:
Do you still believe 9/11 was a terrorist attack where 19 Arab fundamentalists on orders from laptops in caves on the other side of the world outsmarted our trillion dollar defense and intelligence network?
Radical elements in the U.S. government wanted a transformation of foreign policy and increased military spending, and in order to do so, they would need a “New Pearl Harbor” to galvanize the masses to a war agenda.
To ensure such an event, these individuals actually plotted and carried out such an attack (9/11) and killed 2,986 Americans.
I cannot think of a direr crisis in our Republic and for the future of humanity as a whole than a false flag terror attack on Americans plotted and carried out by elements in our own government for political expedience and corporate enrichment – not to mention the groundwork laid for the next world war. These killers and enablers in our government and military apparatus must be brought to justice at once. 9/11 was immensely successful in rallying the masses to a war agenda which has redistributed billions of dollars towards projects not in the interests of a humane Democracy – Guantanamo Bay, Abu Ghraib, two wars of aggression, the Patriot Act and a clearly fraudulent election – These crimes deserve a 21st century “Nuremburg Trial”.
Those are the words of someone going by the moniker of GNixon, a sometimes writer over at Kos. On February 20th 2006 he, along with a gaggle of likewise-affected moonbats wearing their tin foil hats and calling themselves “9/11 Truth activists” will convene at Ground Zero, the former site of the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan, to march against the U.S. Government’s “mass murder of 2,986 Americans on September 11th 2001″.
Protesters will proceed to march to Attorney General Elliot Spitzer’s office with a letter demanding his resignation for “his failure to investigate this crime committed in his jurisdiction despite overwhelming evidence”.
The rally will conclude at the office of former N.Y.C. Mayor Giuliani in Times Square, where they will deliver citizen’s warrant for his arrest for “his role in the attacks at The World Trade Center and criminal complicity in removing evidence from a crime scene”.
You may remember noted theologian David Ray Griffin penned a book in 2004 entitled “The New Pearl Harbor” which blathers on for 200 pages about how the collapse of the World Trade Center towers most likely was caused by explosives placed throughout the towers, not from the plane crashes.
If you’re starting to feel nauseous go over to the Popular Mechanics’ article entitled “9/11: Debunking The Myths“, where they examined the evidence and consulted with the experts to refute the most persistent conspiracy theories of September 11. The moonbats going to this protest probably have neither the intelligence to read the evidence nor the open-mindedness to listen to reason. Fortunately for the rest of us these types usually don’t breed to excess – it’s probably due to their listening to Barbara Streisand songs while watching “The Best Of Tim Robbins” on the Biography channel while thinking that George Clooney and Cindy Sheehen would make a cute couple.
3 responses so far ↓
1 Patty // Jan 25, 2006 at 10:04 am
I’m thinking about getting one of the hotel rooms overlooking Ground Zero, filling a few water balloons with bad cologne, and letting fly. Wanna join me?
2 Greg // Jan 25, 2006 at 4:21 pm
Man, you really let those guys have it. Good job!
I especially like the tin foil hat treatment. You should also call them slugs and say that thier mother eats dirt! Ha! That’ll take the wind out of thier sails.
Of course, if we are actually trying to debate this claim, and not just insult the writer with petty name calling, then we must actually consider what he is saying and logically form an argument against it.
And that’s where this falls apart. Pop mechanics and all, once you examine the evidence…hmmm…perhaps the reason we are resorting to name-calling is because we know that what they are saying is true?
No….can’t be….could it? When I look at all the evidence and confront it, the official story seems like a poorly spun excuse, not much better than the dog-ate-my-homework story.
In fact, there seems to be far more evidence supporting U.S. complicity than there is supporting the official story; much of which is presented in Mr. Griffin’s book. Of course, you would actually have to read the book to understand this, which means turning pages, moving your eyes left to right, occasionally blinking, etc, all of which is a rather difficult task for the average American these days. Yes, it’s far better to simply dismiss Mr. Griffin’s work as a 200-page ramble than to actually try to understand its argument.
BTW, the Pop Mechanics article is a total straw man.
3 Rosemary // Jan 25, 2006 at 10:05 pm
Here is the comment I left over at Knickerbocker News: Great article. I did not know they were STILL at it. I know they are out there, I just didn’t know they could gather people in numbers…lol. It must be in the pucblic educational waters…